Blue Cross of Idaho Logo

Express Sign-on

Thank you for registering with Blue Cross of Idaho

If you are an Individual or Family Member, please register here.

If you are a Medicare Advantage or Medicare Supplement member, please register here.

New Options for Affordable Health Insurance

 

MP 7.01.50 Placental and Umbilical Cord Blood as a Source of Stem Cells

Medical Policy    
Section
Surgery
 
Original Policy Date
11/30/96
Last Review Status/Date
Reviewed with literature search/9:2014
Issue
9:2014
  Return to Medical Policy Index

Disclaimer

Our medical policies are designed for informational purposes only and are not an authorization, or an explanation of benefits, or a contract.  Receipt of benefits is subject to satisfaction of all terms and conditions of the coverage.  Medical technology is constantly changing, and we reserve the right to review and update our policies periodically.


Description

 

A variety of malignant diseases and nonmalignant bone marrow disorders are treated with myeloablative therapy followed by infusion of allogeneic stem and progenitor cells collected from immunologically compatible donors, either from family members or an unrelated donor identified through a bone marrow donor bank. In some cases, a suitable donor is not found.

Blood harvested from the umbilical cord and placenta shortly after delivery of neonates contains stem and progenitor cells capable of restoring hematopoietic function after myeloablation. This “cord” blood has been used as an alternative source of allogeneic stem cells. Cord blood is readily available and is thought to be antigenically “naive,” thus hopefully, minimizing the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and permitting the broader use of unrelated cord blood transplants. Unrelated donors are typically typed at low resolution for human leukocyte antigens (HLA) -A and -B and at high resolution only for HLA-DR; HLA matching at 4 of 6 loci is considered acceptable. Under this matching protocol, an acceptable donor can be identified for almost any patient. (1)

Several cord blood banks have now been developed in Europe and in the United States. In addition to obtaining cord blood for specific related or unrelated patients, some cord blood banks are offering the opportunity to collect and store a neonate’s cord blood for some unspecified future use in the unlikely event that the child develops a condition that would require autologous transplantation. In addition, some cord blood is collected and stored from a neonate for use by a sibling in whom an allogeneic transplant is anticipated due to a history of leukemia or other condition requiring allogeneic transplant.

Standards and accreditation for cord blood banks are important for assisting transplant programs in knowing whether individual banks have quality control measures in place to address such issues as monitoring cell loss, change in potency, and prevention of product mix-up.(2) Two major organizations are working toward these accreditation standards; NetCord/FACT and the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB). NetCord, Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT) has developed and implemented a program of voluntary inspection and accreditation for cord blood banking. In September 2012, NetCord and FACT released the fifth edition of their international standards for cord blood banks.(3) The voluntary program includes standards for collection, testing, processing, storage, and release of cord blood products.

Regulatory Status

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), cord blood stored for potential use by a patient unrelated to the donor meets the definitions of “drug” and “biological products.” As such, products must be licensed under a biologics license application or an investigational new drug application before use. Facilities that prepare cord blood units only for autologous and/or first- or second-degree relatives are required to register and list their products, adhere to Good Tissue Practices issued by the FDA, and use applicable processes for donor suitability determination.(4)


Policy

 

Transplantation of cord blood stem cells from related or unrelated donors may be considered medically necessary in patients with an appropriate indication for allogeneic stem-cell transplant.

Transplantation of cord blood stem cells from related or unrelated donors is considered investigational in all other situations.

Collection and storage of cord blood from a neonate may be considered medically necessary when an allogeneic transplant is imminent in an identified recipient with a diagnosis that is consistent with the possible need for allogeneic transplant.

Prophylactic collection and storage of cord blood from a neonate may be considered not medically necessary when proposed for some unspecified future use as an autologous stem-cell transplant in the original donor, or for some unspecified future use as an allogeneic stem-cell transplant in a related or unrelated donor.


Policy Guidelines

 

Please refer to the reference policies for specific conditions/diseases that have patient selection criteria regarding situations for which allogeneic stem-cell transplantation may be considered medically necessary. 


Benefit Application

 

Through the National Marrow Donor Program’s Related Donor Cord Blood Program, eligible families within the U.S. can collect and store their neonate’s cord blood unit free of charge. When the stored unit is transplanted, a fee is charged. A family is considered eligible if:

  • the sibling of the neonate has been diagnosed with a disease treatable by a related cord blood transplantH;
  • the neonate does not have the same disease as the affected biological sibling (determined after birth);
  • the affected sibling and the neonate have the same biological parents;

or if:

  • an affected biological parent is enrolled in a clinical or research trial that would accept a haploidentical, related, allogeneic cord blood unit as a treatment option.

 


Rationale

 

This policy was originally based on TEC Assessments in 1996 and 2001,(5,6) which addressed the use of placental/umbilical cord blood in children and adults, respectively. The policy was updated regularly with searches of the MEDLINE database, most recently through July 21, 2014.

Related cord blood transplant

The first cord blood transplant was a related cord blood transplant for a child with Fanconi anemia; results were reported in 1989.(7) At least 60 other cord transplants have subsequently been performed in matchedsiblings. The results of these transplants demonstrated that cord blood contains sufficient numbers of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to reconstitute pediatric patients. A lower incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) when cord blood, as compared with bone marrow, was used as the source of donor cells was also observed.(8) This led to the idea that cord blood could be banked and used as a source of unrelated donor cells, possibly without full HLA matching.(9)

Unrelated cord blood transplant

In 1996, outcome data from the first 25 unrelated cord blood transplants completed at Duke University were reported.(10) The authors concluded that cord blood contained sufficient numbers of stem cells and progenitor cells to reconstitute the marrow of children who underwent myeloablative treatments, without full HLA matching between donor and recipient.

Since this time, research has been conducted to study the effectiveness of placental/umbilical cord blood for the treatment of various conditions The first prospective study of unrelated cord blood transplant was the Cord Blood Transplantation study (COBLT) from 1997 to 2004. COBLT was designed to examine the safety of unrelated cord blood transplantation in infants, children, and adults. In children with malignant and nonmalignant conditions, 2-year event-free survival was 55% in children with high-risk malignancies(11) and 78% in children with nonmalignant conditions.(12) Across all groups, the cumulative incidence of engraftment by day 42 was 80%. Engraftment and survival were adversely affected by lower cell doses, pretransplant cytomegalovirus seropositivity in the recipient, non-European ancestry, and higher HLA mismatching. This slower engraftment leads to longer hospitalizations and greater utilization of medical resources.(13) In a retrospective multicenter study of 541 children with acute leukemia, rates of neutrophil recovery at day 60 were statistically different: 96% versus 80% for those receiving unrelated bone marrow and unrelated cord blood, respectively.(14) In the COBLT study, outcomes in adults were inferior to the
outcomes achieved in children.

In 2012, Zhang et al published a meta-analysis of studies comparing unrelated donor cord blood transplantation to unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation in patients with acute leukemia.(15) The authors identified 7 studies with a total of 3389 patients. Pooled rates of engraftment failure (n=5 studies) were 127 events in 694 patients (18%) in the cord blood transplantation group and 57 events in 951
patients (6%) in bone marrow transplantation patients. The rate of engraftment graft failure was significantly higher in cord blood transplantation recipients (p<0.001). However, rates of acute GVHD were significantly lower in the group receiving cord blood transplantation. Pooled rates of GVHD (n=7 studies) were 397 of 1179 (34%) in the cord blood group and 953 of 2189 (44%) in the bone marrow group (p<0.001). Relapse rates, reported in all studies, did not differ significantly between groups. Several survival outcomes including overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and nonrelapse mortality favored the bone marrow transplantation group.

A 2014 study by Liu et al compared outcomes after unrelated donor cord blood transplantation versus matched-sibling donor peripheral blood transplantation.(16) The study included patients age 16 years or older who had hematologic malignancies. A total of 70 patients received unrelated cord blood and 115 patients received HLA-identical peripheral blood stem cells, alone or in combination with bone marrow.

Primary engraftment rates were similar in the 2 groups, 97% in the cord blood group and 100% in the peripheral blood stem-cell group. Rates of most outcomes, including grades III to IV acute GVHD and 3-year disease-free survival were also similar between groups. However, the rate of chronic GVHD was lower in the unrelated-donor cord blood group. Specifically, limited or extensive chronic GVHD occurred in 12 of 58 (21%) evaluable patients in the cord blood group and 46 of 109 (42%) evaluable patients in the peripheral blood stem cell group (p=0.005).

In addition to these studies, there have been numerous retrospective and registry studies. These have generally found that unrelated cord blood transplantation is effective in both children and adults with hematologic malignancies and children with a variety of nonmalignant conditions. Most cord blood transplants have been mismatched at 1 or 2 HLA loci. For example, a 2007 retrospective comparative analysis from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research compared outcomes after unrelated cord blood versus unrelated bone marrow transplant. There were similar 5-year leukemiafree survival for those receiving allele-matched marrow and those who received unrelated cord blood with a 1 or 2 antigen mismatch. Moreover, these studies have identified the importance of a minimum cell dose. For example, a 2013 analysis of data from the Korean Cord Blood Registry found that the presence of at least 3.91x105/kg of infused CD34+ cells was significantly associated with overall survival (p=0.03) in unrelated donor cord blood transplants in children and adolescents.(17) In other studies, a minimum cell dose of 2.5–3.0x107 nucleated cells/kg in the cord blood has been associated with superior clinical outcome.(18-21)

More recently, transplantation of 2 umbilical cord blood units (also known as double unit transplants) have been evaluated as a strategy to overcome cell-dose limitations with 1 cord blood unit in older and heavier patients. Initial experience at the University of Minnesota showed that using 2 units of cord blood for a single transplant in adults improved rates of engraftment and overall survival.(22) A French study evaluating double unit transplants in adults with hematologic malignancies found an engraftment rate of 93% (127/136) and a median overall survival rate of 17.5 months.(23) In 2013, Scaradavou et al published a study comparing outcomes after transplantation of 1 or 2 cord blood units.(24) Data were from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) and the U.S.-based National Cord
Blood Program. All units used for single transplantation contained a minimum cell dose of 2.5–3.0x107 nucleated cells/kg. For the double transplants, the 2 units combined contained more than 2.5–3.0x107 nucleated cells/kg, but in about half of cases, individual units contained less than the minimum amount required. In analyses adjusting for factors associated with outcomes, rates of transplantation-related mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; p=0.63), relapse (HR=0.90, p=0.64) and overall mortality (HR=0.93, p=0.62) were similar in the groups that received single and double transplantations. For patients treated in the earlier period, 2002 to 2004, there was a significantly higher risk of grade 2-4 acute GVHD in recipients of double cord blood units (HR=6.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.54 to 14.87; p<0.001). In the later period, 2004 to 2009, rates of grade 2-4 acute GVHD did not differ significantly between groups (HR=1.69; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.18; p=0.30).

Autologous cord blood transplant

Data regarding the use of cord blood for autologous stem-cell transplantation are quite limited. However, blood banks are available for collecting and storing a neonate’s cord blood for a potential future use. A position paper from the American Academy of Pediatrics noted that there is no evidence of the safety or effectiveness of autologous cord blood transplantation for treatment of malignant neoplasms. (25) This report comments on evidence demonstrating the presence of DNA mutations in cord blood from children who subsequently develop leukemia. In addition, a survey of pediatric hematologists noted few transplants have been performed using cord blood stored in the absences of a known indication. (26) Thus the practice of collecting and storing cord blood for a potential future use is considered not medically necessary.

Ongoing and Unpublished Clinical Trials

Single Versus Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Children With High Risk Leukemia and Myelodysplasia (BMT CTN 0501) (NCT00412360) (27): This RCT is comparing single or double cord blood unit transplantation for treating children with high-risk leukemia and myelodysplasia. The primary study outcome is overall survival. The expected enrollment is 224 patients and the expected date of study completion is May 2015.

Summary of Evidence

Cord blood transplantation offers clear advantages over other sources of allogeneic stem cells; the most significant of these is the ability to perform a successful transplant from an unrelated donor with 1 or 2 HLA mismatches. Cord blood is also more readily available than other sources of stem cells, and generally, can be prepared for clinical use within 1-2 weeks. Collection of the cells is painless, which facilitates recruitment and provides for a more ethnically diverse pool. Current limitations include small inventories, units with low cell doses, and too few donors to provide 5 of 6 and 6 of 6 matches for all patients in need. There is some evidence from retrospective studies that double umbilical cord blood transplants may be a safe and effective alternative to single-unit transplants and several prospective RCTs are underway. Longer hospital stays and higher utilization of medical resources are a consequence of slower engraftment when cord blood is used. Even with these limitations, cord blood is an important source of stem cells, increasing the access to allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for many patients. Because of these advantages, use of cord blood as a source of stem cells in this situation may be considered medically necessary.

In contrast, the routine collection and storage of cord blood for possible future use is not considered current standard medical care and has not been shown to improve outcomes. As a result, routinely collecting and storing cord blood for a potential future use is considered not medically necessary.

Practice Guidelines and Position Statements

On behalf of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, in 2008 Ballen et al(28) published recommendations related to the banking of umbilical cord blood:

  • Public banking of cord blood is encouraged when possible.
  • Storage of cord blood for autologous (i.e., personal) use is not recommended.
  • Family member banking (collecting and storing cord blood for a family member) is recommended when there is a sibling with a disease that may be successfully treated with an allogeneic transplant.
  • Family member banking on behalf of a parent with a disease that may be successfully treated with an allogeneic transplant is only recommended when there are shared HLA antigens between the parents.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations
Use of placental or umbilical cord blood as a source of stem cells is not a preventive service.

Medicare National Coverage
There is no national coverage determination (NCD). In the absence of an NCD, coverage decisions are left to the discretion of local Medicare carriers.

 References:

  1. Godley LA, van Besien K. The next frontier for stem cell transplantation: finding a donor for all. JAMA. Apr 14 2010;303(14):1421-1422. PMID 20388899
  2. Wall DA. Regulatory issues in cord blood banking and transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. Jun 2010;23(2):171-177. PMID 20837328
  3. NetCord-FACT. International standards for cord blood collection banking and release of information accreditation manual- Fifth Edition. September 2012; http://www.factwebsite.org/uploadedFiles/FACT_News/Draft%205th%20Edition%20NetCord-FACT%20Cord%20Blood%20Accreditation%20Manual.09.04.12.pdf. Accessed June, 2014.
  4. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Cord Blood Banking: Information for Consumers (July 23, 2012).
    http://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/resourcesforyou/consumers/ucm236044.htm. Accessed August, 2014.
  5. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Technology Evaluation Center (TEC). Placental and Umbilical Cord Blood as a Source of Stem Cells for Hematopoietic Support. TEC Assessments 1996; Volume 11, Tab 17. PMID
  6. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Technology Evaluation Center (TEC). Transplanting Adult Patients with Hematopoietic Stem Cells from Placental and Umbilical Cord Blood. . TEC Assessments 2001; Volume 16, Tab 7 PMID
  7. Gluckman E, Broxmeyer HA, Auerbach AD, et al. Hematopoietic reconstitution in a patient with Fanconi's anemia by means of umbilical-cord blood from an HLA-identical sibling. N Engl J Med. Oct 26 1989;321(17):1174-1178. PMID 2571931
  8. Wagner JE, Rosenthal J, Sweetman R, et al. Successful transplantation of HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched umbilical cord blood from unrelated donors: analysis of engraftment and acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood. Aug 1 1996;88(3):795-802. PMID 8704232
  9. Broxmeyer HE, Douglas GW, Hangoc G, et al. Human umbilical cord blood as a potential source of transplantable hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 1989;86(10):3828-3832. PMID 2566997
  10. Kurtzberg J, Laughlin M, Graham ML, et al. Placental blood as a source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation into unrelated recipients. N Engl J Med. Jul 18 1996;335(3):157-166. PMID 8657213
  11. Kurtzberg J, Cairo MS, Fraser JK, et al. Results of the cord blood transplantation (COBLT) study unrelated donor banking program. Transfusion. Jun 2005;45(6):842-855. PMID 15934981
  12. Martin PL, Carter SL, Kernan NA, et al. Results of the cord blood transplantation study (COBLT): outcomes of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation in pediatric patients with lysosomal and peroxisomal storage diseases. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. Feb 2006;12(2):184-194. PMID 16443516
  13. Kurtzberg J. Update on umbilical cord blood transplantation. Curr Opin Pediatr. Feb 2009;21(1):22-29. PMID 19253461
  14. Rocha V, Cornish J, Sievers EL, et al. Comparison of outcomes of unrelated bone marrow and umbilical cord blood transplants in children with acute leukemia. Blood. May 15 2001;97(10):2962-2971. PMID 11342418
  15. Zhang H, Chen J, Que W. A Meta-Analysis of Unrelated Donor Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation versus Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation in Acute Leukemia Patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. Aug 2012;18(8):1164-1173. PMID 22289799
  16. Liu HL, Sun ZM, Geng LQ, et al. Similar survival, but better quality of life after myeloablative transplantation using unrelated cord blood vs matched sibling donors in adults with hematologic malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. May 19 2014. PMID 24842525
  17. Park M, Lee YH, Kang HR, et al. Unrelated donor cord blood transplantation for non-malignant disorders in children and adolescents. Pediatr Transplant. Mar 2014;18(2):221-229. PMID 24372660
  18. Gluckman E, Rocha V, Boyer-Chammard A, et al. Outcome of cord-blood transplantation from related and unrelated donors. Eurocord Transplant Group and the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. N Engl J Med. Aug 7 1997;337(6):373-381. PMID 11341126
  19. Kurtzberg J, Prasad VK, Carter SL, et al. Results of the Cord Blood Transplantation Study (COBLT): clinical outcomes of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood. Nov 15 2008;112(10):4318-4327. PMID 18723429
  20. Prasad VK, Kurtzberg J. Emerging trends in transplantation of inherited metabolic diseases. Bone Marrow Transplant. Jan 2008;41(2):99-108. PMID 18176609
  21. Rubinstein P, Carrier C, Scaradavou A, et al. Outcomes among 562 recipients of placental-blood transplants from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. Nov 26 1998;339(22):1565-1577. PMID 9828244
  22. Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor TE, et al. Transplantation of 2 partially HLA-matched umbilical cord blood units to enhance engraftment in adults with hematologic malignancy. Blood. Feb 1 2005;105(3):1343-1347. PMID 15466923
  23. Wallet HL, Sobh M, Morisset S, et al. Double umbilical cord blood transplantation for hematological  malignancies: a long- term analysis from the SFGM-TC registry. Exp Hematol. Jul 2 2013. PMID 23831606
  24. Scaradavou A, Brunstein CG, Eapen M, et al. Double unit grafts successfully extend the application of umbilical cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia. Blood. Jan 31 2013;121(5):752-758. PMID 23223509
  25. Lubin BH, Shearer WT. Cord blood banking for potential future transplantation. Pediatrics. Jan 2007;119(1):165-170. PMID 17200285
  26. Thornley I, Eapen M, Sung L, et al. Private cord blood banking: experiences and views of pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation physicians. Pediatrics. Mar 2009;123(3):1011-1017. PMID 19255033
  27. Sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin. Single Versus Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Children With High Risk Leukemia and Myelodysplasia (BMT CTN 0501) (NCT00412360). www.clinicaltrials.gov. Accessed June, 2014.
  28. Ballen KK, Barker JN, Stewart SK, et al. Collection and preservation of cord blood for personal use. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. Mar 2008;14(3):356-363. PMID 18275904 

Codes

Number

Description

CPT 

  No specific code

ICD-9 Procedure 

41.04 

Transplantation of stem cells 

ICD-9 Diagnosis 

 

[See the diagnosis codes listed in the various policies relevant to allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in the Therapy section of the MPRM (such as 8.01.15, 8.01.21, 8.01.22, etc.)] 

HCPCS 

S2140

Cord blood harvesting for transplantation, allogeneic

  S2142 Cord blood derived stem-cell transplantation, allogeneic
  S2150 Bone marrow or blood-derived stem cells (peripheral or umbilical), allogeneic or autologous, harvesting, transplantation, and related complications; including: pheresis and cell preparation/storage; marrow ablative therapy; drugs; supplies; hospitalization with outpatient follow-up; medical/surgical, diagnostic, emergency, and rehabilitative services; and the number of days of pre- and post-transplant care in the global definition

ICD-10-CM (effective 10/1/15)

 

 

 

[See the dianosis codes listed in the various policies relevant to

allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in the Therapy section of the

MPRM (such as 8.01.15, 8.01.21, 8.01.22, etc.)] 

ICD-10-PCS (effective 10/1/15)

30243X0, 30243X1 Percutaneous transfusion, central vein, stem cells, cord blood, autologous or nonautologous, code list 

Type of Service

Transplant

Place of Service  Inpatient

 


Index

 

Cord Blood as a Source of Stem Cells
Transplantation, Placental and Umbilical Cord Blood as a Source of Stem Cells 


Policy History

 

Date Action Reason
11/30/96 Add to Surgery section New policy
04/01/98 Replace policy Policy updated, new indications added
02/15/02 Replace policy Policy updated and revised based on TEC Assessment; cord blood as a source of stem cells not longer restricted to children, considered medically necessary in adults
04/29/03 Replace policy Policy updated; no change in policy statement
06/10/10 Replace policy Policy updated and returned to active review status with extensive revisions. References 1, 2, and 5–19 added. Intent of policy statements unchanged.
10/04/11 Replace policy Policy updated with literature review; policy statement unchanged. References 3,4 added
10/11/12 Replace Policy Policy updated with literature review; policy statements unchanged. References 5, 9-11 added.
9/12/13 Replace policy Policy updated with literature review through July 25, 2013; policy statements unchanged. References 4, 5, 19, 20, 26, 29 and 30 added.
9/11/14 Replace policy Policy updated with literature review through July 21, 2014. Policy statements unchanged. References 4, 16-17, and 23 added.